Safety Review
Safety-critical review lane
Structured code review for MISRA-C:2012, assert usage, and defensive patterns around patient hazards.
Indicative fee: 2 400 000 Ft · informational only
Scope narrative
This lane is for teams that want external eyes before an external reviewer pass. We read your critical modules, log findings in your tracker template, and separate must-fix items from style debt. Tone stays technical—no theatre.
Included focus areas
- Coverage-guided selection of critical translation units
- MISRA deviation activity log alignment
- Assert strategy review with fault-injection notes
- RTOS API misuse scan focused on medical alarm paths
- Pairing blocks for your verification and validation lead
- Exit briefing with a concise risk residual list
Outcomes you can archive
- A cleaner review packet for your next design inspection
- Fewer last-minute rework loops in verification
- A shared checklist your juniors can reuse
FAQ
Do you sign off on safety?
No. We provide engineering findings. Stakeholder sign-off remains with your quality roles.
Can we limit scope to two modules?
Yes. Narrow scope improves depth; we document what was excluded.
What tooling do you require?
Read access to your repo and static analysis exports if available.
Experience notes
The MISRA deviation activity log finally matched what reviewers asked for. One module still needs internal cleanup—that was flagged honestly.